BREAKING: District Court Sets Aside DHS and DOL H-1B Wage Rules (Dec. 1, 2020)

A California federal judge set aside the fast-tracked Departments of Labor and Homeland Security rules that significantly increased prevailing wage levels and tightened H-1B eligibility criteria. Finding that defendants "failed to show there was good cause to dispense with the rational and thoughtful discourse that is provided by the APA's notice and comment requirements," the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California set aside the Department of Homeland Security’s interim final rule, Strengthening the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Program, and the Department of Labor’s interim final rule, Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States. The Department of Labor’s rule, increasing required wages for the high-skilled visa program, went into immediate effect on October 8, 2020. The Department of Homeland Security’s fast-tracked rule changing H-1B eligibility criteria was set to go into effect on December 7, 2020.

The summary judgement ruling is immediately effective, though a speedy government appeal could affect the decision’s implementation.

Regardless of the outcome of an appeal, the agencies could take administrative steps to reissue the regulations in the remaining weeks of the Trump Administration. 

The case is Chamber of Commerce et al. v. DHS et al., Case No. 4:20-CV-7331 (N.D. Ca., Dec. 1, 2020).

Goldblum & Pollins is monitoring the ongoing litigation and any agency announcements regarding the court order and will post updates accordingly. 

U.S. State Department Creates Visitor Visa Bond Pilot Program (Nov. 24, 2020)

Prospective tourists and visitors from more than 20 countries, mostly in Africa, could pay as much as a $15,000 bond to obtain a U.S. visa under a new rule from the Trump administration. On November 24, 2020, the U.S. Department of State published a Temporary Final Rule creating a six-month pilot program under which applicants for B-1/B-2 visas from countries with overstay rates of ten percent or higher and who have been approved by the Department of Homeland Security for an inadmissibility waiver may be required to post a bond as a condition of visa issuance. Under the pilot program, which starts December 24, 2020 and runs through June 24, 2021, U.S. consular officials could require applicants for B-1 and B-2 visas who hail from the selected countries to pay a $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 bond.

Of the 23 countries subject to the new rules, 15 are African. They are Angola, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Eritrea, the Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Libya, Mauritania, Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan. Visa-seekers from Afghanistan, Bhutan, Burma, Iran, Laos, Papua New Guinea, Syria and Yemen could also be required to pay the bonds. Visa-holders who post bonds are entitled to a full refund, along with accrued interest, if they fully comply with the terms of their stay in the U.S.

U.S. State Department Updates Guidance on Confucius Institutes and J Program Sponsorship (Nov. 18, 2020)

On November 18, 2020, the Department of State's (DOS) Exchange Visitor Program (BridgeUSA) issued Guidance Directive 2020-01, Exchange Visitor Program - Confucius Institutes, which provides guidance on the relationship of college and university J-1 exchange programs to Confucius Institutes and associated activities at K-12 schools and universities. Confucius Institutes, sponsored by the Chinese government, serve to promote Chinese language, literature, and culture throughout the world, and they commonly partner with U.S. institutions of higher education. The Guidance identifies “areas of concern” to DOS, and seeks to “provide sponsors more clarity regarding the possible regulatory violations presented in some CI operations so they can make informed choices about sponsoring exchange visitors coming on program through CIs.” Some J program sponsors affiliated with Confucius Institute on their campuses report having received DOS requests for documents and exchange visitor records related to their Confucius Institute.

Federal Court Invalidates Changes to DACA Because Chad Wolf Was Unlawfully Appointed (Nov. 16, 2020)

A federal judge has ruled that recent changes to Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) that were a veiled attempt to gut the program are invalid because Chad Wolf—the acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)—was not lawfully appointed to his position. The new decision marks the third time that a court has found that Wolf was unlawfully appointed as Acting Secretary. Like the two prior cases, the court agreed with an August opinion from the Government Accountability Office that found that DHS had made a key error in 2019 when DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned from office.

For now, Wolf’s tenuous grasp on the acting secretary position has put DHS into the position where every major action taken by the agency in the last weeks of the Trump administration come with an asterisk. If courts continue to strike down policies signed off by Wolf, it could make the Biden administration’s efforts to undo the changes to the immigration system a little easier.

USCIS Announces a Revised Naturalization Civics Test (Nov. 13, 2020)

On Friday, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officially announced plans to implement a revised version of the naturalization civics test, after first announcing the plans to revise in July 2019. Lawful permanent residents seeking to become U.S. citizens will now be required to take a more difficult and longer citizenship test.

The new test increases the total number of questions from 100 to 128. Applicants will be verbally asked 20 questions and must answer at least 12 correctly, up from six out of 10.

Applicants who apply for naturalization on or after Dec. 1, 2020, will take the updated version of the test. Those who apply before Dec. 1, 2020, will take the current version of the test. USCIS will maintain the current guidelines for statutorily established special considerations for applicants who are 65 years old or older and have at least 20 years of lawful permanent resident status.

DHS Proposes to Change H-1B Lottery to Wage-Based Selection Process (Nov. 2, 2020)

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently issued a proposed rule that would change the way it selects the registrations of U.S. employers that want to file H-1B petitions subject to the annual “cap.” Currently, when USCIS receives more petitions than allowed under the annual limit it relies on a random lottery to select Petitions for processing. In its place, USCIS would select petitions based on the registrations received starting with the highest salary level and working down.

The H-1B visa category is for jobs that require a worker to apply a body of highly specialized knowledge acquired through a bachelor’s or higher degree in a “specific specialty” or equivalent at the entry level. U.S. employers are prohibited from hiring an H-1B worker at a wage or under working conditions less favorable than comparable U.S. workers.

Congress placed an annual “cap” of 65,000 H-1B visa numbers for employers subject to the “cap.” Congress also provided for an additional 20,000 “advanced degree” visa numbers annually for foreign nationals who hold a master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution of higher education.

In 2020, USCIS accepted “cap-subject” H-1B petitions for filing by random selection from required registrations. Obtaining (and specifying) a wage for an individual was not part of the H-1B registration system in 2020, which means this new rule would complicate the process.

Under the proposed scheme, USCIS would rank and select the petitions received on the basis of the highest Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) wage level that the proffered wage equals or exceeds for the relevant Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code in the area of intended employment, beginning with OES wage level IV and proceeding in descending order with OES wage levels III, II, and I,” according to the proposed regulatory language.

According to USCIS, a change to wage level selection will “incentivize” employers to offer higher wages to H-1B workers and “disincentivize” alleged hiring abuses. But a study by the National Foundation for American Policy demonstrates that having H-1B workers in an occupation reduces, on average, the unemployment rate in the occupation.

Notably, USCIS acknowledged in another rulemaking, establishing the current registration system, that selection based on wage could only be accomplished by a change to the law. Now USCIS claims that wage level selection is a reasonable reading of the law.

This proposed rule is another example of this administration trying to restrict employment-based immigration that Congress has authorized. Excluding all H-1B petitions at Level 1 wages, and many at Level 2, will limit U.S. employers’ ability to hire recent foreign graduates of U.S. advanced degree programs. This is detrimental to many sectors of the economy, including, but not limited to, health care, education, and research and development.

Trump Administration Issues Two New Rules to Restrict H-1B Visas (Oct. 7, 2020)

On October 8, 2020, the Department of Labor issued a new rule designed to make it much more expensive to employ an H-1B visa holder, while the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a new regulation to limit H-1B visas by introducing restrictive definitions of a specialty occupation and an employer-employee relationship, and limiting H-1B approvals to one year for work at customer locations. Both regulations bypassed the normal rulemaking process, raising additional legal questions.

The Department of Labor (DOL) published an interim final rule (IFR) titled Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States which went into immediate effect. Under the law, an employer must pay an H-1B visa holder the higher of the prevailing wage or actual wage paid to similar U.S. workers, and in the permanent residence context, the employer generally must pay at least the DOL-determined prevailing wage. DOL now determines the prevailing wage by using data from the government’s Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) wage survey and using a mathematical formula to create four levels of wages for each occupation. The rule changes how DOL's National Prevailing Wage Center (NPWC) applies its four wage-level system to generate prevailing wage determinations when Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) data is used as the wage data source. The result is dramatically higher NPWC prevailing wage determinations impacting both the temporary (e.g., H-1B) and permanent (PERM) programs.

On the same day, the Department of Homeland Security published an interim final rule at 85 FR 63918 (October 8, 2020) titled Strengthening the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Program. This rule is effective on December 7, 2020. Changes include revised definitions of and standards for a "specialty occupation" and "employer-employee relationship," limited petition validity for third-party placements, and other changes that make use of the H-1B category more challenging.

Multiple lawsuits were filed challenging both the DOL Wage Rule and the DHS H-1B Rule:

  • Chamber of Commerce et al. v. DHS et al., Case No. 4:20-CV-7331 (N.D. Ca., October 19, 2020). Challenges both the DOL and DHS interim final rules. See the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center for more information, including case filings. Next hearing scheduled: November 23, 2020.

  • Purdue, et al. v. Scalia, Case No. 1:20-CV-03006 (D.D.C., October 19, 2020). Challenges the DOL rule only. A hearing was scheduled for November 13, 2020, but on November 10, it was cancelled. "In view of the Court's forthcoming Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court hereby cancels the motion hearing scheduled for November 13, 2020."

  • ITServe Alliance Inc., et al. v. Scalia, Case No. 3:20-14604 (D.N.J., October 16, 2020). Challenges the DOL rule only.

DHS Issues Proposed Rule to Eliminate Decades-Long Duration of Status Policy for International Students, Exchange Visitors (Sept. 25, 2020)

On September 25, 2020, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a proposed rule to eliminate duration of status (D/S) for F students and their dependents, J exchange visitors and their dependents, and I media representatives. This is a proposed rule, which means that it is not yet law and does not have an effective date. It will proceed through normal APA public notice and comment procedures before any final rule is published.

The rule proposes several changes that would disrupt administration of international education programs and sends a strong message that international students and scholars are not welcome in the U.S.:

  • Date-Specific admission of F and J nonimmigrants: Instead of being admitted for "duration of status" (D/S) as they currently are, individuals applying for admission in either F or J status (F-1 students, F-2 dependents, J-1 exchange visitors, and J-2 dependents) would be admitted only until the program end date noted in their Form I-20 or DS-2019, not to exceed 4 years, unless they are subject to a more limited 2-year admission, plus a period of 30 days following their program end date.

    • F and J nonimmigrants seeking a program extension would be required to timely apply for an extension of stay (EOS) on Form I-539 with USCIS to remain in the U.S. beyond the status expiration date on their I-94, including filing fees and biometrics, and including when seeking Optional Practical Training or Academic Training.

    • Reduces the F-1 "grace period" from 60 days to 30 days.

  • Limit on aggregate ESL study. F-1 students in a language training program would be restricted to a lifetime aggregate of 24 months of language study, which would include breaks and an annual vacation.

  • Limit on pursuing new F-1 programs at the same educational level. DHS proposes to limit the number of times a student can change to another program within an educational level, such as to pursue another bachelor's or master's degree. Specifically, any student who has completed a program at one educational level would be allowed to change to another program at the same educational level no more than two additional times while in F-1 status, for a total of three programs for the lifetime of the student.

  • Limit on "reverse matriculation" by F-1 students. An F-1 student who has completed a program at one educational level would be allowed to change to a lower educational level one time while in F-1 status. The one-time limit on changing to a lower educational level following completion of a program at a higher level is a lifetime restriction and does not reset with a new admission as an F-1.

The Trump administration says the proposed rule is necessary to increase oversight of international students and combat fraud and visa overstays. Advocates for international students say the proposed rule creates unnecessary new burdens for international students and makes the U.S. a less welcoming destination at a time when international student enrollment has already been declining.

The more than one million international students in the U.S. are estimated to have a $41 billion economic impact and account for 5.5 percent of all students enrolled in higher education in this country.

"This proposed rule is set to replace a proven, flexible policy that has served international students and exchange visitors for decades, with one that is both complicated and burdensome," Esther D. Brimmer, the executive director and CEO of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, said in a statement. "In a system that is already extremely complex, this rule would undoubtably create a high degree of uncertainty for international students and exchange visitors. If finalized, this rule would also make it more difficult for international students and scholars to maintain their legal status in the United States and make it far more difficult for international educators to administer. Sadly, this proposal sends another message to immigrants, and in particular international students and exchange visitors, that their exceptional talent, work ethic, diverse perspectives, and economic contributions are not welcome in the United States."

USCIS Says Employees Can—for a Limited Period— Use an EAD Approval Notice for Form I-9 Verification; DHS Extends Form I-9 Remote Inspection Accommodations for Additional 30 Days (Aug. 21, 2020)

USCIS announced on August 20, 2020, that due to delays in the production of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs), starting immediately and continuing through December 1, 2020, certain employees may present a Form I-797 Notice of Action approving an Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765) as a List C #7 document issued by the Department of Homeland Security to establish employment authorization (and for current employees, to re-verify employment authorization) for Form I-9 compliance.

In order to serve as a valid List C document for Form I-9 purposes during this period, the Form I-797 Notice of Action must be dated on or after 12/1/19 through 8/20/20.

This announcement does not allow the I-797 Notice to be used as evidence of identity (List B), nor to serve as a List A document for establishing both identity and employment authorization, for I-9 purposes. Accordingly, an employee who presents an I-797 Notice of Action for evidence of employment authorization must also present an acceptable List B document to establish identity.

Importantly, employers must re-verify employees who present the Form I-797 as their List C document to establish (or re-verify) authorization during this period, using a document from either List A or List C, by December 1, 2020.

In addition, on August 18, 2020, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced an additional extension of the flexibility in complying with requirements related to Form I-9 due to COVID-19.

This temporary guidance was set to expire August 18. Because of ongoing precautions related to COVID-19, DHS has extended this policy for an additional 30 days.

This provision only applies to employers and workplaces that are operating remotely. See the original news release for more information on how to obtain, remotely inspect, and retain copies of the identity and employment eligibility documents to complete Section 2 of Form I-9.

Employers must monitor the DHS and ICE websites for additional updates about when the extensions end and normal operations resume.

E-Verify participants who meet the criteria and choose the remote inspection option should continue to follow current guidance and create cases for their new hires within three business days from the date of hire. Please see USCIS’s COVID-19 webpage for more information.

Court Dismisses Government's Appeal of Permanent Injunction of Student Unlawful Presence Memo (Aug. 6, 2020)

On August 3, 2020, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ended litigation around the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)’s 2018 unlawful presence (ULP) policy for foreign students by dismissing the government’s appeal of a lower court’s decision to preliminary enjoin the administration’s unlawful presence policy.

Previously, U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs issued a decision permanently enjoining the new unlawful presence policy, as laid out in the policy memorandum entitled Accrual of Unlawful Presence and F, J, and M Nonimmigrants. DHS initially appealed the ruling, only to reverse course and ask for the case to be dismissed last week. 

The dismissal makes the District Court’s February 6, 2020 decision final. That order stated:

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ August 9, 2018 memorandum entitled “Accrual of Unlawful Presence and F, J, and M Nonimmigrants,” (PM-602-1060.1), as well as the corresponding memorandum with the same title issued on May 10, 2018 (PM-602-1060), are hereby declared invalid, set aside, and enjoined nationwide in all applications.

Despite the return to existing rules for foreign students and exchange visitors, a violation of nonimmigrant status still puts an individual "out of status" and makes them subject to removal from the United States, even though "unlawful presence" may not have started being counted. Foreign students or exchange visitors should consult an experienced immigration lawyer if they have questions about or need strategies to deal with unlawful presence and status violations in their individual situation.

In addition, DHS announced its intention to issue a proposed rule titled "Enhancing the Integrity of the Unlawful Presence Inadmissibility Provisions," which appears in the Spring 2020 Regulatory Agenda with a target date of 03/00/2021. DHS/USCIS, RIN 1615-AC46. DHS/USCIS had published this item for the first time in the Fall 2019 regulatory agenda, and it appears related to the agency's unsuccessful attempt to revise its unlawful presence policy via policy memo, which ran afoul of Administrative Procedure Act requirements for public notice and comment.

USCIS Finalizes Significant Filing Fee Increases and Changes to its Current Fee Structure (Aug. 6, 2020)

new DHS fee schedule, slated to take effect on October 2, 2020, will increase costs for most petitioners and applicants, and will impose new filing fees and fee requirements for many case types, according to a final rule published in the Federal Register on August 3, 2020. The revised fee schedule and structure was initially revealed in a proposed regulation published in November 2019. The final rule makes few changes to the initial plan. 

Under the final rule, total filing fees for adjustment applications (green card applications) and related benefits will nearly double, as will fees for naturalization. Employers petitioning for nonimmigrant employees would be subject to fee increases of up to 75%, depending on the nonimmigrant classification sought. With some case types, including naturalization applications and requests to replace or extend green card, a $10 discount will be offered to those that opt to file applications online instead of by mail.

In addition to fee increases, the final rule increases the premium processing timeline to almost three weeks, from 15 calendar days, imposes new fees and/or additional fees on asylum and DACA applicants, and requires employers with a high proportion of H-1B and L-1 employees to make additional border security fee payments when petitioning for these employees.

The new rule comes as USCIS is seeking from Congress $1.2 billion in emergency funding to make up budget shortfalls due to a significant decrease in case filing volume, despite that USCIS will actually end the year with a budget surplus. The agency – which is largely funded by filing fees – has indicated that, without additional monies from Congress, it would need to furlough more than 13,000 members of its workforce; furloughs had been planned for August 3, 2020, but have been postponed until August 31, 2020. If the furloughs are implemented, USCIS case processing is likely to be slowed significantly.

District Court Issues Nationwide Injunction on Both DOS and DHS Public Charge Regulations Due to COVID-19 (July 29, 2020)

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary stay of the Department of Homeland Security’s Final Rule on Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds Rule (“Public Charge Rule”). The government is enjoined from enforcing, applying, implementing, or treating as effective the Rule for any period during which there is a declared national health emergency in response to the COVID-19 outbreak.

The order notes, “a nationwide injunction is both necessary to redress the harms caused by the Rule and appropriate given the strong federal interest in uniformity of the national health and immigration policies at issue here.”

The Court also issued a separate order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the application or implementation of the 2018 Foreign Affairs Manual Public Charge Revisions, Department of State Public Charge Rule, and Public Charge Proclamation.

The order notes, “a geographically limited injunction would be especially unworkable in a case such as this, where consular officers on foreign soil would have to determine how to apply different rules to different applicants.”

The injunctions remain in place until further order of the Court. The Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State are likely to appeal these orders, but the agencies also should issue guidance in the meantime regarding the filing of impacted immigration applications.

If you have questions about how these orders may impact your case with Goldblum & Pollins, contact your attorney.

Department of State Announces Exceptions to COVID-related Entry Bans for Certain Travelers from the Schengen Area, United Kingdom, and Ireland (July 16, 2020)

Certain business travelers, investors, treaty traders, academics, and students may qualify for National Interest Exceptions under Presidential Proclamations 9993 (Schengen Area) and 9996 (United Kingdom and Ireland). Read more here.

Government Rescinds SEVP July 6 Guidance; Higher Education Returns to Status Quo of March Guidance (July 14, 2020)

In a hearing before the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts on Tuesday, July 14, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agreed to rescind the guidance issued by the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) on July 6, 2020, which would have banned nonimmigrant F-1 and M-1 students attending schools operating entirely online from remaining in the U.S. while taking a full online course load. DHS rescinded the Fall 2020 guidance in response to a lawsuit from Harvard University & the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and widespread backlash, and reverted back to the guidance issued in March. For Fall 2020, international students in the United States will be allowed to take more than one virtual class and still maintain active student status.

The parties’ agreement rescinds any implementation of the July policy directive or FAQ, returns all parties to the status quo reflected by the March 9 and March 13 policy directives issued by SEVP, and precludes enforcement of SEVP’s July policy on a nationwide basis. These procedural adaptations gave institutions of higher education flexibility to teach entirely online for student and faculty safety while international students maintained their active status within the United States. 

The lawsuit is President & Fellows of Harvard College, et al. v. US Department of Homeland Security, CA 20-11283-ADB (D. Mass.). Six other lawsuits have been filed by various States and institutions of higher education.

The previous guidance, issued in March, permits the following procedural adaptations:

  • If a school closes temporarily but offers online instruction or another alternative learning procedure, nonimmigrant students should participate in online or other alternate learning procedures and remain in active status in SEVIS. SEVP will allow F-1 and/or M-1 students to temporarily count online classes towards a full course of study in excess of the typical regulatory limits. This is true even for students who have left the United States and are taking the online classes from elsewhere.

  • If a school closes temporarily without online instruction or other alternative learning procedures, the students should remain in active status in SEVIS so long as the students intend to resume their course of study when classes resume. This is similar to short-term breaks in the school calendar when classes are not in session.

  • If a school determines that it will exercise temporary closure or make other significant operational or curricular changes, the school must advise SEVP of accommodations it is making for its F and M nonimmigrant population within 10 business days of the date of the decision to initiate the operational change.

Questions still remain:

  • The March guidance stated that it applied to students who are currently enrolled in a program of study (Active SEVIS status) and was not intended for new or initial students who are outside the United States. New, initial students were directed to remain outside the United States. It remains unclear whether such students would now be permitted to enter the U.S. to begin a fully-online, or even partially-online course of study.

  • Neither SEVP nor USCIS provided guidance as to whether Active students who were outside the United States and concluding their programs could apply for Optional Practical Training employment authorization.

It can be expected that the government will take formal actions to rescind the July directives and FAQ, and to making any conforming revisions to its March 2020 guidance.

SEVP Updates COVID-19 Guidance for Higher Ed Online-Only Instruction No Longer Permitted

International students attending U.S. colleges and universities that will operate entirely online this fall semester cannot remain in the country to do so, according to new guidance issued by the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) on July 6. The new guidance is a prelude to a forthcoming temporary regulation.

Under current regulations, F-1 international students are only permitted to take one online course (3 credits) per semester toward their “full course of study” requirements for maintaining status. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic this spring, SEVP issued temporary procedural adaptations related to online courses for spring and summer sessions, which gave institutions of higher education flexibility to teach entirely online for student and faculty safety while international students maintained their active status.

Now, however, SEVP has modified that temporary guidance effective with the fall 2020 semester in a July 6, 2020 Broadcast Message. Notably, not all schools received yesterday’s broadcast message; it is expected to be followed by a Temporary Final Rule—a temporary change to federal regulations.

If a school will offer courses entirely online for fall 2020, international students will not be able to maintain their status at such schools. If abroad, they will not be issued a visa by the Department of State or permitted to enter by Customs & Border Protection. If here, they will need to transfer to a school offering in-person classes, depart the U.S., or try to change to another status. SEVP says the same is true if the school must switch to online-only instruction mid-semester: students who are here must transfer, depart, or try to change status.

If a school will offer a hybrid model – a mix of in-person and online classes – international students will be allowed to take more than the usual limit of one online course, but cannot have a fully-online semester. Designated School Officials (DSOs) will be required to certify to SEVP that

  • the program is not entirely online,

  • the student is not taking an entirely online course load for the fall 2020 semester, and

  • the student is taking the minimum number of online classes required to make normal progress in their degree program.

Schools are expected to notify SEVP of changes to a hybrid model of instruction by August 1, and issue new Forms I-20 to students with the above certification by August 4. Both such dates will be challenging given that course registration periods may extend beyond this point, and given the millions of international students currently in the US.

For schools that return to entirely in-person instruction, the usual rule permitting only one online class will apply.

The above exemptions do not apply to F-1 students in English language training programs or M-1 vocational students, who are not permitted to enroll in any online courses.

For graduate students whose “coursework” consists of research and serving as an instructor, rather than attending classes themselves, it appears that this policy change will not impact them, but questions remain for the eventual temporary regulation.

Continuing F and M students who are outside the U.S., and whose schools are offering entirely-online courses for fall 2020, may remain in Active status in SEVIS if they are taking online courses and are able to meet the normal full course of study requirements. Only students enrolled at a school that is only offering online coursework can engage in remote learning from their home country. Students whose schools have moved to a hybrid program, or students whose SEVIS record is in Initial status (new students) cannot engage in remote learning from their home country to maintain F-1 status.

The new guidance is short-sighted and inflexible, particularly as many institutions are still trying to determine the safest way to educate their students in a fluid situation. The guidance is harmful to international students and to the larger campus communities, because it puts student and faculty health and well-being at risk. In the long-term, it continues the administration’s path of making U.S. higher education less attractive to talented international students who would otherwise study here.

If you have questions about how students at your institution may be impacted, or if you are a student with questions of your own, you can contact us to schedule a consultation or discussion.

President Trump Issues Proclamation Suspending Entry of Certain H, J, and L Nonimmigrants through December 2020 (June 22, 2020; updated July 2, 2020)

On June 22, 2020, the president issued a proclamation titled Proclamation Suspending Entry of Aliens Who Present a Risk to the U.S. Labor Market Following the Coronavirus Outbreak, that will go into effect at 12:01 a.m. EDT on June 24, 2020.

Section 1 of the proclamation extends the effective dates of the President’s April 22 Proclamation titled Suspending Entry of Immigrants Who Present Risk to the U.S. Labor Market During the Economic Recovery Following the COVID-19 Outbreak. This proclamation suspended entry of certain new immigrants who do not already have an approved immigrant visa. It was originally valid for 60 days, until June 22, 2020. The new proclamation extends the period for an additional 4 months, until December 31, 2020.

Section 2 of the proclamation suspends "entry into the United States of any alien seeking entry pursuant to any of the following nonimmigrant visas" until December 31, 2020, subject to certain exceptions:

"an H-1B or H-2B visa, and any alien accompanying or following to join such alien [H-4];"

"a J visa, to the extent the alien is participating in an intern, trainee, teacher, camp counselor, au pair, or summer work travel program, and any alien accompanying or following to join such alien;"

"an L visa, and any alien accompanying or following to join such alien."

Importantly, the entry bar for those in J Exchange Visitor categories does not apply to exchange categories other than those listed. For example, it does not apply to participants in the J professor, research scholar, short-term scholar, college or university student, or ECFMG alien physician categories.

Section 3 of the proclamation establishes that this entry bar applies only to an individual who:

"(i)  is outside the United States on the effective date of this proclamation;

(ii)  does not have a nonimmigrant visa that is valid on the effective date of this proclamation; and

(iii)  does not have an official travel document other than a visa (such as a transportation letter, an appropriate boarding foil, or an advance parole document) that is valid on the effective date of this proclamation or issued on any date thereafter that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission."

An amendment to the proclamation was issued on June 29, attempting to clarify the visa issue and appearing to confirm that visa exempt individuals, such as Canadian citizens, are not covered by the proclamation.

The new section 3 reads:

Sec3.  Scope of Suspension and Limitation on Entry.  (a)  The suspension and limitation on entry pursuant to section 2 of this proclamation shall apply only to any alien who:

(i)    is outside the United States on the effective date of this proclamation;

(ii)  does not have a nonimmigrant visa, of any of the classifications specified in section 2 of this proclamation and pursuant to which the alien is seeking entry, that is valid on the effective date of this proclamation; and

(iii)  does not have an official travel document other than a visa (such as a transportation letter, an appropriate boarding foil, or an advance parole document) that is valid on the effective date of this proclamation or issued on any date thereafter that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission.

Despite that Section 3 appears to require both that the person was outside the U.S. on the effective date and lacked a valid H, L or J visa on the effective date in order to be subject to the proclamation, the Department of State has announced its position not to issue any of the impacted visas through December 31, 2020. This means that even if a person was present in the U.S. with a valid visa on June 24, if that person departs the U.S. and requires visa re-stamping, they will be unable to do so during the proclamation’s effectiveness. If you are in the designated H, L, or J statuses you SHOULD NOT TRAVEL ABROAD without first speaking with a qualified immigration attorney.

In addition, the proclamation does not apply to:

"(i)    any lawful permanent resident of the United States;

(ii)   any alien who is the spouse or child, as defined in section 101(b)(1) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1101(b)(1)), of a United States citizen;

(iii)  any alien seeking to enter the United States to provide temporary labor or services essential to the United States food supply chain; and

(iv)   any alien whose entry would be in the national interest as determined by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their respective designees."

The “national interest waivers” in Section 3(b)(iv) are intended to include those that:

  • are critical to the defense, law enforcement, diplomacy, or national security of the United States;

  • are involved with the provision of medical care to individuals who have contracted COVID-19 and are currently hospitalized;

  • are involved with the provision of medical research at United States facilities to help the United States combat COVID-19; or

  • are necessary to facilitate the immediate and continued economic recovery of the United States.

Additional Measures Called for by the Proclamation

Section 4 directs that, "Within 30 days of June 24, 2020, and every 60 days thereafter while this proclamation is in effect, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Labor, recommend any modifications as may be necessary.”

Section 5 calls on the agencies to take substantial "additional measures," such as:

  • Directing the U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Department of Homeland Security to ensure compliance with the permanent labor certification (PERM) and temporary labor condition application (LCA) statutory rules that are designed to protect U.S. workers;

  • Directing DHS and U.S. Department of State to ensure compliance with biographic and biometric data collection requirements;

  • Directing DHS to "take appropriate and necessary steps, consistent with applicable law, to prevent certain aliens who have final orders of removal; who are inadmissible or deportable from the United States; or who have been arrested for, charged with, or convicted of a criminal offense in the United States, from obtaining eligibility to work in the United States."

  • Directing DHS to "consider promulgating regulations or take other appropriate action regarding the efficient allocation of visas pursuant to section 214(g)(3) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(3)) and ensuring that the presence in the United States of H-1B nonimmigrants does not disadvantage United States workers."

President Trump Issues Proclamation Suspending Entry in F or J Status of Certain Students and Researchers from the People’s Republic of China (May 29, 2020)

President Trump issued a proclamation suspending entry as nonimmigrants of certain Students and Researchers from the People’s Republic of China.

This proclamation is effective at 12:00 p.m. EDT on June 1, 2020.

The proclamation suspends and limits entry to the U.S. in F Student or J Exchange Visitor status for nationals of China who:

  1. are outside the United States on the effective date of this proclamation;

  2. currently or previously receives(ed) funding from or is (was) employed by, studies(ed) at, or conducts(ed) research at or on behalf of

  3. an entity in the PRC that implements or supports the PRC’s “military-civil fusion strategy.”

The proclamation DOES NOT apply to students seeking undergraduate education. It also does not apply to lawful permanent residents; spouses of US citizens or lawful permanent residents; members of the US Armed Forces, or a spouse or child of a service members; certain diplomats; or those who field of study or research does not contribute to the PRC’s "military-civil fusion strategy,” would further important US objectives, or is in the US national interest, as determined by the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security.

In addition, the Secretary of State must consider whether to revoke the existing F or J visas of Chinese nationals currently in the US who meet criteria 2 and 3 above. If a visa is revoked, it does not impact the person’s current status within the US, but means they would be unable to return after international travel.

You can read the Proclamation here.

If you have questions about your case, please contact us.

President Trump Issues Proclamation Suspending Entry of Immigrants for 60 Days; Extensions Possible (April 22, 2020)

President Trump issued a proclamation "Suspending Entry of Immigrants Who Present Risk to the U.S. Labor Market During the Economic Recovery Following the COVID-19 Outbreak."

This proclamation is effective at 11:59 pm (ET) on April 23, 2020. The proclamation will expire 60 days from its effective date and may be continued.

The proclamation suspends and limits entry to the U.S. for individuals who:

  1. are outside the United States on the effective date of this proclamation;

  2. do not have an immigrant visa that is valid on the effective date of this proclamation; and

  3. do not have an official travel document other than a visa (such as a transportation letter, an appropriate boarding foil, or an advance parole document) that is valid on the effective date of this proclamation or issued on any date thereafter that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission.

The proclamation includes several exemptions for certain classes of immigrants, including those in the EB-5 category; physicians, nurses, or other healthcare professionals, or those performing medical research or other research intended to combat the spread of COVID-19; and spouses and certain children of U.S. citizens, among others.

The proclamation does not apply to nonimmigrants, such as those in H, TN, O, E, L, F or J statuses. The proclamation does not apply to those seeking to adjust to lawful permanent resident status inside the United States.

You can read the Proclamation here.

If you have questions about your case, please contact us.

FEDERAL COURT GRANTS PERMANENT NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION OF USCIS UNLAWFUL PRESENCE MEMO FOR F, M, AND J STUDENTS AND SCHOLARS (FEB. 6, 2020)

On February 6, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina issued a permanent nationwide injunction blocking the August 8, 2018 USCIS policy memo that sought to change how days of unlawful presence are counted following a violation of F, M, or J nonimmigrant status. The court's order states:

"The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services' August 9, 2018 memorandum entitled "Accrual of Unlawful Presence and F, J, and M Nonimmigrants" (PM-602-1060.1), as well as the corresponding memorandum with the same title issued on May 10, 2018 (PM-602-1060), are hereby declared invalid, set aside, and enjoined nationwide in all applications."

The court determined that the government had failed to comply with the Administrative Procedures Act when it issued the 2018 policy memo, and thus the rule had to be set aside. More importantly, however, the court held that, “because the unlawful-presence policy embodied in the August 2018 PM conflicts with clear statutory text, no amount of adherence to procedure can rectify the memorandum’s defects unless and until Congress amends the [Immigration and Nationality Act].”

The 2018 policy memo was already subject to a preliminary injunction that temporarily halted enforcement while the underlying case was resolved. As a consequence, since May 2019, USCIS has been applying the prior policy guidance, under which individuals admitted for duration of status (“D/S”) do not begin accruing unlawful presence until an immigration judge finds a status violation in the course of an immigration proceeding, or an immigration officer finds a violation of status in the course of an application for an immigration benefit. The February 6, 2020 decision and order means that the 2009 policy will continue in place. DHS may appeal the decision.

Students and scholars with questions about violations of status, unlawful presence, the injunction and their individual situation, should consult an experienced immigration lawyer.

Updates: Travel Restrictions Due to Coronavirus and Travel Ban+; Plus Implementation of Public Charge Rule Mid-February (Feb. 3, 2020)

Responding to the Coronavirus Situation, United States Restricts Travel From China

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Azar announced a ban on foreign nationals traveling from China and quarantines for U.S. citizens coming from China. The restrictions went into effect at 5:00 p.m. (EST) on Sunday, February 2.

  • Foreign nationals who have traveled in China within the last 14 days will be denied entry into the United States, with the exception of lawful permanent residents, immediate family members of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, and certain others. Those not subject to the ban include:

    • U.S. lawful permanent residents;

    • The spouse of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident;

    • The parent/legal guardian of a U.S. citizen or permanent resident, if the U.S. citizen or permanent resident is unmarried and under 21;

    • The sibling of a U.S. citizen or permanent resident, provided that both are unmarried and under 21;

    • A child, foster child, or ward of a U.S. citizen or permanent resident, or who is a prospective adoptee seeking to enter the United States pursuant to the IR-4 or IH-4 visa classifications;

    • A foreign national traveling at the invitation of the United States Government for a purpose related to containment or mitigation of the virus;

    • Nonimmigrant crew members;

    • Foreign nationals seeking entry or transiting the U.S. under an A-1, A-2, C-2, C-3, G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, NATO-1 through NATO-4, or NATO-6 visa;

    • Foreign nationals whose entry would not pose a significant risk of introducing, transmitting, or spreading the virus, as determined by the Centers for Disease Control;

    • Foreign nationals permitted entry by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their respective designees.

  • Any U.S. citizen or qualifying foreign national returning to the U.S. who has been in Hubei province in the 14 days prior to their entry will be subject to a mandatory quarantine of 14 days to ensure they have been provided proper medical care and health screening. Those subject to mandatory quarantines will be housed at U.S. military facilities.

  • Any U.S. citizen or qualifying foreign national returning to the U.S. who has been anywhere else in mainland China in the 14 days prior to their entry to the U.S. will undergo "proactive entry health screening at a select number of ports of entry," and up to 14 days of "monitored self-quarantine" to ensure they have not contracted the virus and do not pose a public health risk.

  • All flights from China to the U.S. as well as flights with passengers who have visited China will be channeled into eleven U.S. airports (see below).

  • Visa appointments are U.S. Consulates in China will be cancelled until further notice as of February 2, 2020. Foreign nationals with visa appointments or awaiting visa issuance from U.S. Consulates in China should check with the relevant consulate for the latest information on closures and consular operations.

Trump Administration Announces Expansion of Travel Ban to six additional countries

In a January 31, 2020, Presidential Proclamation, the Trump administration expanded its travel ban to place visa and entry restrictions on travelers from six additional countries.

What You Need to Know:

  • The six countries added to the existing travel ban are: Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan, and Tanzania.

  • The expanded ban becomes effective at 12:01 a.m. (EST) on February 21, 2020.

  • The ban contains restrictions on immigrants but not on nonimmigrants, so it will not impact acquisition of nonimmigrant visas like F-1 student, J-1 exchange visitor, H-1B worker, etc., or of admission to the United States in those categories.

U.S. Supreme court authorizes dhs to implement 2019 public charge rule while litigation continues

On January 27, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order lifting a nationwide injunction and permitting the Trump Administration to implement its 2019 Final Rule Governing Inadmissibility on Grounds of Public Charge under INA 212(a)(4) (“Public Charge Rule”) while litigation continues. DHS remains enjoined from implementing the Public Charge Rule in Illinois, where a lower federal court has imposed a state-wide injunction.

  • USCIS announced that it will begin implementing the Public Charge Rule on February 24, 2020.

  • The Public Charge Rule will apply to applications and petitions postmarked (or submitted electronically) on or after February 24, 2020. For applications and petitions that are sent by commercial courier (e.g., UPS/FedEx/DHL), the postmark date is the date reflected on the courier receipt.

  • USCIS has clarified that it will not consider an individual’s application for, approval to receive, or receipt of certain non-cash public benefits before February 24, 2020, when deciding whether the foreign national is likely at any time to become a public charge under the Rule.

  • The Public Charge Rule impacts those filing Forms I-129, I-485, I-539, I-864, and I-864EZ. These updated forms must be used beginning February 24, 2020, otherwise applications and petitions using incorrect editions of the forms will be rejected.

As a reminder, the 2019 Public Charge Rule changes how USCIS officers will adjudicate applications for admission to the United States, extension of stay, change of status, and adjustment of status:

  • The term “public charge” will be redefined to mean a foreign national “who receives one or more designated public benefits for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period (such that, for instance, receipt of two benefits in one month counts as two months).”

  • The term “public benefit” will be expanded to include non-cash benefits such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), most forms of Medicaid, and Section 8 Housing Assistance under the Housing Choice Voucher Program, among others.

  • Extension of stay or change of status applicants will be required to demonstrate that they have NOT received public benefits over the designated 12/36 month threshold since obtaining the nonimmigrant status they seek to extend or change.

  • Adjustment of status applicants subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility (as determined on Form I-485) will be required to file a “Declaration of Self-Sufficiency” (Form I-944) with their adjustment of status applications to demonstrate that they are not likely to become a public charge. The applicants may also post a “public charge bond” in the amount of no less than $8,100 to help prove same.

Of course, if you or your employees have any questions about the above, contact us!

The information contained in website is provided for educational purposes only and not as part of an attorney-client relationship. It is not a substitute for legal advice.